Objectives: Up to 20 % of incidentally found testicular lesions are benign Leydig cell tumours (LCTs). This study evaluates the role of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the identification of LCTs in a large prospective cohort study. Materials and methods: We enrolled 44 consecutive patients with at least one solid non-palpable testicular lesion who underwent scrotal MRI. Margins of the lesions, signal intensity and pattern of wash-in and wash-out were analysed by two radiologists. The frequency distribution of malignant and benign MRI features in the different groups was compared by using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Results: The sensitivity of scrotal MRI to diagnose LCTs was 89.47 % with 95.65 % specificity; sensitivity for malignant lesions was 95.65 % with 80.95 % specificity. A markedly hypointense signal on T2-WI, rapid and marked wash-in followed by a prolonged washout were distinctive features significantly associated with LCTs. Malignant lesions were significantly associated with blurred margins, weak hypointense signal on T2-WI ,and weak and progressive wash-in. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 93 %. Conclusions: LCTs have distinctive contrast-enhanced MRI features that allow the differential diagnosis of incidental testicular lesions. Key Points: • MRI is able to characterize testicular lesions suggesting a specific diagnosis. • Rapid and marked wash-in is a common feature of Leydig cell tumours. • Markedly hypointense T2-WI signal is significantly correlated with benign lesions. • Blurred margins and weak hypointense T2-WI signal are correlated with malignant tumours. • Weak and progressive wash-in features are present in 85 % of seminomatous lesions.

A prospective study on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of testicular lesions: distinctive features of Leydig cell tumours

SCIALPI, Michele;
2015

Abstract

Objectives: Up to 20 % of incidentally found testicular lesions are benign Leydig cell tumours (LCTs). This study evaluates the role of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the identification of LCTs in a large prospective cohort study. Materials and methods: We enrolled 44 consecutive patients with at least one solid non-palpable testicular lesion who underwent scrotal MRI. Margins of the lesions, signal intensity and pattern of wash-in and wash-out were analysed by two radiologists. The frequency distribution of malignant and benign MRI features in the different groups was compared by using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Results: The sensitivity of scrotal MRI to diagnose LCTs was 89.47 % with 95.65 % specificity; sensitivity for malignant lesions was 95.65 % with 80.95 % specificity. A markedly hypointense signal on T2-WI, rapid and marked wash-in followed by a prolonged washout were distinctive features significantly associated with LCTs. Malignant lesions were significantly associated with blurred margins, weak hypointense signal on T2-WI ,and weak and progressive wash-in. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 93 %. Conclusions: LCTs have distinctive contrast-enhanced MRI features that allow the differential diagnosis of incidental testicular lesions. Key Points: • MRI is able to characterize testicular lesions suggesting a specific diagnosis. • Rapid and marked wash-in is a common feature of Leydig cell tumours. • Markedly hypointense T2-WI signal is significantly correlated with benign lesions. • Blurred margins and weak hypointense T2-WI signal are correlated with malignant tumours. • Weak and progressive wash-in features are present in 85 % of seminomatous lesions.
2015
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1358356
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact