In vibration fatigue the frequency contents of dynamic loading and structure’s dynamic response overlap, resulting in amplified stress loads of the structure. Time domain fatigue approach does not give a good insight into the underlying mechanics of failure and therefore recently vibration fatigue in frequency domain is getting a lot of scientific attention. Gaussianity and stationarity assumptions are applied in frequency-domain methods for obtaining dynamic structure’s response and frequency-domain methods for calculating damage accumulation rate. However, in application, the structures are excited with non-Gaussian and non-stationary loads and this study addresses the effects of such dynamic excitation to experimental time-to-failure of a structure. The influence of non-Gaussian, but stationary excitation, is experimentally studied via excitation signals with equal power density spectrum and different values of kurtosis. The non-Gaussianity was found not to significantly change the structure’s time-to-failure and therefore, the study focuses on the non-stationary excitation signals that are also inherently non-Gaussian. The non-stationarity of excitation was achieved by amplitude modulation and significantly shorter times-to-failure were observed when compared to experiments with stationary non-Gaussian excitation. Additionally, the structure’s time-to-failure varied with the rate of the amplitude modulation. To oversee this phenomenon the presented study proposes a non-stationarity index which can be obtained from the excitation time history. The non-stationarity index was experimentally confirmed as a reliable estimator for severity of non-stationary excitation. The non-stationarity index is used to determine if the frequency-domain methods can safely be applied for time-to-failure calculation.

Non-stationarity and non-Gaussianity in Vibration Fatigue

Capponi, Lorenzo;Palmieri, Massimiliano;Cianetti, Filippo;
2020

Abstract

In vibration fatigue the frequency contents of dynamic loading and structure’s dynamic response overlap, resulting in amplified stress loads of the structure. Time domain fatigue approach does not give a good insight into the underlying mechanics of failure and therefore recently vibration fatigue in frequency domain is getting a lot of scientific attention. Gaussianity and stationarity assumptions are applied in frequency-domain methods for obtaining dynamic structure’s response and frequency-domain methods for calculating damage accumulation rate. However, in application, the structures are excited with non-Gaussian and non-stationary loads and this study addresses the effects of such dynamic excitation to experimental time-to-failure of a structure. The influence of non-Gaussian, but stationary excitation, is experimentally studied via excitation signals with equal power density spectrum and different values of kurtosis. The non-Gaussianity was found not to significantly change the structure’s time-to-failure and therefore, the study focuses on the non-stationary excitation signals that are also inherently non-Gaussian. The non-stationarity of excitation was achieved by amplitude modulation and significantly shorter times-to-failure were observed when compared to experiments with stationary non-Gaussian excitation. Additionally, the structure’s time-to-failure varied with the rate of the amplitude modulation. To oversee this phenomenon the presented study proposes a non-stationarity index which can be obtained from the excitation time history. The non-stationarity index was experimentally confirmed as a reliable estimator for severity of non-stationary excitation. The non-stationarity index is used to determine if the frequency-domain methods can safely be applied for time-to-failure calculation.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1450351
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact