Globalization provokes a split between the economic dimension (dynamic) and the legal dimension (static). The first one is increasingly mobile across different jurisdictions while the latter lags behind as far as it is still produced at domestic level, or is delegated to supranational administrative bodies. This creates problems of political accounting of public decisions through the weakening of nation state sovereignty. As a consequence, it nourishes the feeling that democratic control itself is undermined. In this setting democracy seems to become controversial, swinging between a technocratic model and a demagogic one. Are these the only alternative possible?
WITHER DEMOCRACY? A NOTE
boccaccio
2021
Abstract
Globalization provokes a split between the economic dimension (dynamic) and the legal dimension (static). The first one is increasingly mobile across different jurisdictions while the latter lags behind as far as it is still produced at domestic level, or is delegated to supranational administrative bodies. This creates problems of political accounting of public decisions through the weakening of nation state sovereignty. As a consequence, it nourishes the feeling that democratic control itself is undermined. In this setting democracy seems to become controversial, swinging between a technocratic model and a demagogic one. Are these the only alternative possible?| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
e-pfrp50.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
PDF-editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.17 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.17 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
