We deal with conditional probability in the sense of de Finetti and with T-conditional possibility (with T a triangular norm). We prove that Dubois and Prade conditional possibility is a particular min-conditional possibility and then we compare the two notions of conditioning by an inferential point of view. Moreover, we study T-conditional possibilities as functions of the conditioning event, putting in evidence analogies and differences with conditional probabilities. This allows to characterize likelihood functions (and their aggregations) consistent either with a T-conditional possibility or a conditional probability. This analysis highlights many syntactical coincidences. Nevertheless the main difference is a weak form of monotonicity, which arises only in the possibilistic case.

Possibilistic and probabilistic likelihood functions and their extensions: Common features and specific characteristics.

COLETTI, Giulianella;PETTURITI, DAVIDE;
2014

Abstract

We deal with conditional probability in the sense of de Finetti and with T-conditional possibility (with T a triangular norm). We prove that Dubois and Prade conditional possibility is a particular min-conditional possibility and then we compare the two notions of conditioning by an inferential point of view. Moreover, we study T-conditional possibilities as functions of the conditioning event, putting in evidence analogies and differences with conditional probabilities. This allows to characterize likelihood functions (and their aggregations) consistent either with a T-conditional possibility or a conditional probability. This analysis highlights many syntactical coincidences. Nevertheless the main difference is a weak form of monotonicity, which arises only in the possibilistic case.
2014
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1179277
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact