The essay critically discusses some theoretical and empirical aporias that characterize the sociological concept of identity. In particular, it highlights the common sense origin of the category of identity and the characteristics of essentialism and realism that characterize its psychological root. Finally, it puts forward an alternative way of research according to which the identity no longer identifies a real group but a discursive practice.

Abbiamo veramente bisogno d'identità? Alcune precauzioni sull'uso di un concetto ambiguo

CANIGLIA, Enrico
2013

Abstract

The essay critically discusses some theoretical and empirical aporias that characterize the sociological concept of identity. In particular, it highlights the common sense origin of the category of identity and the characteristics of essentialism and realism that characterize its psychological root. Finally, it puts forward an alternative way of research according to which the identity no longer identifies a real group but a discursive practice.
2013
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1341874
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact