The essay is aimed to disclose the anti-monolithic nature of Equity, moving from its plural declensions in the cultural domain (and especially a juridical, theological, literary, and philosophical declension). The inquiry faces multifarious levels of questions: from the detection of the ubiquitous notions connected with equity (a kind of Foucaultian archaeology), to the critical comprehension of the traditions that shaped the wandering soul of equity into heterogeneous appearances of coherence, passing through the analysis of the pivotal role played by equity in the creation of clashing cultures each of them with its proper discursive structure. Equity's hybrid genealogy clarifies the historical strategies inherently concealed by the rhetorical spaces of jurisdictions and radically discloses the plural languages which made the English Ancient Constitution
Equity’s Different Talks
Costantini, Cristina
2008
Abstract
The essay is aimed to disclose the anti-monolithic nature of Equity, moving from its plural declensions in the cultural domain (and especially a juridical, theological, literary, and philosophical declension). The inquiry faces multifarious levels of questions: from the detection of the ubiquitous notions connected with equity (a kind of Foucaultian archaeology), to the critical comprehension of the traditions that shaped the wandering soul of equity into heterogeneous appearances of coherence, passing through the analysis of the pivotal role played by equity in the creation of clashing cultures each of them with its proper discursive structure. Equity's hybrid genealogy clarifies the historical strategies inherently concealed by the rhetorical spaces of jurisdictions and radically discloses the plural languages which made the English Ancient ConstitutionI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
