This work, based on the data of two earthworks recently completed on two sites near Lake Trasimeno (Central Italy), examines the consequences of the enforcement in Europe of the fall-cone test for the Liquid Limit (LLcone) instead of the Casagrande cup (LLcup). This new standard has been incorporated in the latest Italian soil classification (UNI 11531-1:2014), substituting the previous one (UNI 10006:2002). A set of 28 soil samples was analysed: the research shows that LLcone is always greater than LLcup. According to the old standard, all samples were suitable for the works planned but, according to the new one, 18 % of samples became unsuitable. This is in spite of the fact that there is nothing to show that the old classification was ‘‘unsafe.’’ The new standard (based on LLcone) restricts the choice of materials, so that not only will costs for earthworks increase in the future but, paradoxically, because of the new standard, thousands of kilometers of properly working old leve´es became suddenly ‘‘unsafe.’’ The results suggest that soil classification criteria for earthworks should be reconsidered in order to transform the conventional ‘‘index properties’’ to sound physical characteristics.

Effects of fall-cone test on classification of soils: some considerations from study of two engineering earthworks in Central Italy

DI MATTEO, Lucio
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
DRAGONI, Valter Ulderico;CENCETTI, Corrado;
2016

Abstract

This work, based on the data of two earthworks recently completed on two sites near Lake Trasimeno (Central Italy), examines the consequences of the enforcement in Europe of the fall-cone test for the Liquid Limit (LLcone) instead of the Casagrande cup (LLcup). This new standard has been incorporated in the latest Italian soil classification (UNI 11531-1:2014), substituting the previous one (UNI 10006:2002). A set of 28 soil samples was analysed: the research shows that LLcone is always greater than LLcup. According to the old standard, all samples were suitable for the works planned but, according to the new one, 18 % of samples became unsuitable. This is in spite of the fact that there is nothing to show that the old classification was ‘‘unsafe.’’ The new standard (based on LLcone) restricts the choice of materials, so that not only will costs for earthworks increase in the future but, paradoxically, because of the new standard, thousands of kilometers of properly working old leve´es became suddenly ‘‘unsafe.’’ The results suggest that soil classification criteria for earthworks should be reconsidered in order to transform the conventional ‘‘index properties’’ to sound physical characteristics.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BEGE_Di Matteo et al.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 777.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
777.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1355433
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact