The essay – by critically analyzing the debate on hermeneutics and critic of ideology between Habermas and Gadamer – suggests a «weak» perspective in sociology of knowledge which, through highlighting the mutually interconnected character of being and thought, could serve as an anti-reductionist model of sociologic knowledge. It is an attempt that starting from Mannheim – and using his distinction between immanent and non-immanent analysis – tries to provide a new interpretation of the notions of ideology, of intellectuals and of social criticism.
Sul rapporto tra genesi e validità del sapere. Per un programma debole di sociologia della conoscenza.
A. Santambrogio
2018
Abstract
The essay – by critically analyzing the debate on hermeneutics and critic of ideology between Habermas and Gadamer – suggests a «weak» perspective in sociology of knowledge which, through highlighting the mutually interconnected character of being and thought, could serve as an anti-reductionist model of sociologic knowledge. It is an attempt that starting from Mannheim – and using his distinction between immanent and non-immanent analysis – tries to provide a new interpretation of the notions of ideology, of intellectuals and of social criticism.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
