The essay – by critically analyzing the debate on hermeneutics and critic of ideology between Habermas and Gadamer – suggests a «weak» perspective in sociology of knowledge which, through highlighting the mutually interconnected character of being and thought, could serve as an anti-reductionist model of sociologic knowledge. It is an attempt that starting from Mannheim – and using his distinction between immanent and non-immanent analysis – tries to provide a new interpretation of the notions of ideology, of intellectuals and of social criticism.

Sul rapporto tra genesi e validità del sapere. Per un programma debole di sociologia della conoscenza.

A. Santambrogio
2018

Abstract

The essay – by critically analyzing the debate on hermeneutics and critic of ideology between Habermas and Gadamer – suggests a «weak» perspective in sociology of knowledge which, through highlighting the mutually interconnected character of being and thought, could serve as an anti-reductionist model of sociologic knowledge. It is an attempt that starting from Mannheim – and using his distinction between immanent and non-immanent analysis – tries to provide a new interpretation of the notions of ideology, of intellectuals and of social criticism.
2018
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1439331
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact