“Oh No, Reviewer 3 got our paper rejected again!”, remains a popular phrase that is often used to vent frustration with negative editorial decisions. As practicing scientists, we work on our manuscripts like other authors and submit our papers to see them published quickly. Like every author, we also live with anxiety during the review process. We experience the joy of acceptance and the pain of rejection of our papers. Furthermore, we devote time to review papers for various other journals and upload our comments in a timely fashion. Being editors of ACS Energy Letters is just an additional task in which we are engaged but one we take as much pride in as publishing our own work.
We Editors Are Authors, Too
DE ANGELIS, Filippo;
2019
Abstract
“Oh No, Reviewer 3 got our paper rejected again!”, remains a popular phrase that is often used to vent frustration with negative editorial decisions. As practicing scientists, we work on our manuscripts like other authors and submit our papers to see them published quickly. Like every author, we also live with anxiety during the review process. We experience the joy of acceptance and the pain of rejection of our papers. Furthermore, we devote time to review papers for various other journals and upload our comments in a timely fashion. Being editors of ACS Energy Letters is just an additional task in which we are engaged but one we take as much pride in as publishing our own work.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
