In this paper we study the performance of the sampling Kantorovich (S–K) algorithm for image processing with other well-known interpolation and quasi-interpolation methods. The S-K algorithm has been implemented with three different families of kernels: cen- tral B-splines, Jackson type and Bochner–Riesz. The above method is compared, in term of PSNR (Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio) and CPU time, with the bilinear and bicubic interpo- lation, the quasi FIR (Finite Impulse Response) and quasi IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) approximation. Experimental results show better performance of S-K algorithm than the considered other ones.

A comparison between the sampling Kantorovich algorithm for digital image processing with some interpolation and quasi-interpolation methods

Danilo Costarelli
;
Marco Seracini;Gianluca Vinti
2020

Abstract

In this paper we study the performance of the sampling Kantorovich (S–K) algorithm for image processing with other well-known interpolation and quasi-interpolation methods. The S-K algorithm has been implemented with three different families of kernels: cen- tral B-splines, Jackson type and Bochner–Riesz. The above method is compared, in term of PSNR (Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio) and CPU time, with the bilinear and bicubic interpo- lation, the quasi FIR (Finite Impulse Response) and quasi IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) approximation. Experimental results show better performance of S-K algorithm than the considered other ones.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
REV-Numeric_Comparison_KANTO_2019_DOI.pdf

Open Access dal 26/01/2022

Tipologia di allegato: Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1457009
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
social impact