In 2015, three of the proposals (Nos. 1, 16, and 18) prepared by the former Special Committee (Willner et al. 2011) were submitted to the Assembly of the GPN for voting, following the GPN Bylaws (Art. 9.2c, 10.2a). The original proposal No. 17 (aimed at conservation of the name Berberidion Br.-Bl. ex Tx. 1952) was not submitted for voting because the Steering Committee suggested reconsidering the validity of the name Berberidion Br.-Bl. 1950. This might be a case for a ‘binding decision’ − a procedure that should be implemented in the next edition of the Code. Some other proposals, all referring to nomina mutata, were not submitted to vote because the corresponding rules are likely to change in the next edition of the Code. The recommendations of the Special Committee were followed in all three cases. Therefore, the decisions are as follows: (i) The name Luzulo-Quercetum sessilis Hilitzer 1932 is not rejected as a nomen ambiguum (proposal rejected). (ii) The name Laricetum deciduae Bojko 1931 is rejected as a nomen ambiguum (proposal accepted). (iii) The name Asperulo odoratae-Fagetum Sougnez & Thill 1959 is conserved against the names Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum Hartmann 1953 and Festuco altissimae-Fagetum Schlüter 1957 (proposal accepted).

Decision on nomenclatural proposals (1), (16) and (18)

Gigante D.;
2019

Abstract

In 2015, three of the proposals (Nos. 1, 16, and 18) prepared by the former Special Committee (Willner et al. 2011) were submitted to the Assembly of the GPN for voting, following the GPN Bylaws (Art. 9.2c, 10.2a). The original proposal No. 17 (aimed at conservation of the name Berberidion Br.-Bl. ex Tx. 1952) was not submitted for voting because the Steering Committee suggested reconsidering the validity of the name Berberidion Br.-Bl. 1950. This might be a case for a ‘binding decision’ − a procedure that should be implemented in the next edition of the Code. Some other proposals, all referring to nomina mutata, were not submitted to vote because the corresponding rules are likely to change in the next edition of the Code. The recommendations of the Special Committee were followed in all three cases. Therefore, the decisions are as follows: (i) The name Luzulo-Quercetum sessilis Hilitzer 1932 is not rejected as a nomen ambiguum (proposal rejected). (ii) The name Laricetum deciduae Bojko 1931 is rejected as a nomen ambiguum (proposal accepted). (iii) The name Asperulo odoratae-Fagetum Sougnez & Thill 1959 is conserved against the names Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum Hartmann 1953 and Festuco altissimae-Fagetum Schlüter 1957 (proposal accepted).
2019
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1458966
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact