OBJECTIVE To prove equivalence of individual, clinically titrated basal insulin doses of glargine 300 units⋅mL−1 (Gla-300) and degludec 100 units⋅mL−1 (Deg-100) under steady state conditions in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study, on the glucose pharmacodynamics (PD) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Subjects with T1D (N = 22, 11 men, age 44.3 ± 12.4 years, disease duration 25.5 ± 11.7 years, A1C 7.07 ± 0.63% [53.7 ± 6.9 mmol⋅mL−1], BMI 22.5 ± 2.7 kg·m−2), naïve to Gla-300 and Deg-100, underwent 24-h euglycemic clamps with individual clinical doses of Gla-300 (0.34 ± 0.08 units ⋅ kg−1) and Deg-100 (0.26 ± 0.06 units ⋅ kg−1), dosing at 2000 h, after 3 months of optimal titration of basal (and bolus) insulin. RESULTS At the end of 3 months, Gla-300 and Deg-100 reduced slightly and, similarly, A1C versus baseline. Clamp average plasma glucose (0–24 h) was euglycemic with both insulins. The area under curve of glucose infused (AUC-GIR[0–24 h[) was equivalent for the two insulins (ratio 1.04, 90% CI 0.91–1.18). Suppression of endogenous glucose production, free fatty acids, glycerol, and β-hydroxybutyrate was 9%, 14%, 14%, and 18% greater, respectively, with Gla-300 compared with Deg-100 during the first 12 h, while glucagon suppression was no different. Relative within-day PD variability was 23% lower with Gla-300 versus Deg-100 (ratio 0.77, 90% CI 0.63–0.92). CONCLUSIONS In T1D, individualized, clinically titrated doses of Gla-300 and Deg-100 at steady state result in similar glycemic control and PD equivalence during euglycemic clamps. Clinical doses of Gla-300 compared with Deg-100 are higher and associated with quite similar even 24-h distribution of PD and antilipolytic effects.

PHARMACOKINETIC AND PHARMACODYNAMIC HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON OF CLINICAL, EQUIVALENT DOSES OF INSULIN GLARGINE 300 U/ML AND INSULIN DEGLUDEC 100 U/ML IN TYPE 1 DIABETES

Paola Lucidi;Paola Candeloro;Patrizia Cioli;Anna Marinelli Andreoli;Chiara Pascucci;Angela Gambelunghe;Geremia B. Bolli;Carmine G. Fanelli
;
Francesca Porcellati
2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To prove equivalence of individual, clinically titrated basal insulin doses of glargine 300 units⋅mL−1 (Gla-300) and degludec 100 units⋅mL−1 (Deg-100) under steady state conditions in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study, on the glucose pharmacodynamics (PD) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Subjects with T1D (N = 22, 11 men, age 44.3 ± 12.4 years, disease duration 25.5 ± 11.7 years, A1C 7.07 ± 0.63% [53.7 ± 6.9 mmol⋅mL−1], BMI 22.5 ± 2.7 kg·m−2), naïve to Gla-300 and Deg-100, underwent 24-h euglycemic clamps with individual clinical doses of Gla-300 (0.34 ± 0.08 units ⋅ kg−1) and Deg-100 (0.26 ± 0.06 units ⋅ kg−1), dosing at 2000 h, after 3 months of optimal titration of basal (and bolus) insulin. RESULTS At the end of 3 months, Gla-300 and Deg-100 reduced slightly and, similarly, A1C versus baseline. Clamp average plasma glucose (0–24 h) was euglycemic with both insulins. The area under curve of glucose infused (AUC-GIR[0–24 h[) was equivalent for the two insulins (ratio 1.04, 90% CI 0.91–1.18). Suppression of endogenous glucose production, free fatty acids, glycerol, and β-hydroxybutyrate was 9%, 14%, 14%, and 18% greater, respectively, with Gla-300 compared with Deg-100 during the first 12 h, while glucagon suppression was no different. Relative within-day PD variability was 23% lower with Gla-300 versus Deg-100 (ratio 0.77, 90% CI 0.63–0.92). CONCLUSIONS In T1D, individualized, clinically titrated doses of Gla-300 and Deg-100 at steady state result in similar glycemic control and PD equivalence during euglycemic clamps. Clinical doses of Gla-300 compared with Deg-100 are higher and associated with quite similar even 24-h distribution of PD and antilipolytic effects.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1477898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact