PURPOSE: An alternative to surgery for penile cancer is radiation therapy which is administered with external beam techniques and/or brachytherapy (BT) either interstitial or using a surface applicator. Here we report our experience in penile cancer patients treated with high-dose-rate (HDR)-BT with the surface technique, analyzing dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 2016 and December 2019, 7 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis received HDR-BT by means of customized applicators that were constructed using a 3D printer or thermoplastic mask. The total dose was 57 Gy in 19 fractions. RESULTS: Median clinical target volume percentage receiving 95%, 125%, and 150% of the prescribed dose were 93.1% (range 92.2–98.5), 12% (range 7.4–32.2), and 0.24% (range 0–10.8), respectively. Median urethral volumes receiving 90% and 115% of the prescribed dose were 40.2% (range 21.0–83.8) and 0% (range 0–1), respectively. All patients achieved complete remission. No patient developed G3 or G4 acute or late toxicities. No patient experienced urethral stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Surface HDR-BT in penile cancer is feasible and is associated with a high tolerance profile and good outcomes.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy with surface applicator in penile cancer

Ingrosso G.;Aristei C.
2021

Abstract

PURPOSE: An alternative to surgery for penile cancer is radiation therapy which is administered with external beam techniques and/or brachytherapy (BT) either interstitial or using a surface applicator. Here we report our experience in penile cancer patients treated with high-dose-rate (HDR)-BT with the surface technique, analyzing dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 2016 and December 2019, 7 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis received HDR-BT by means of customized applicators that were constructed using a 3D printer or thermoplastic mask. The total dose was 57 Gy in 19 fractions. RESULTS: Median clinical target volume percentage receiving 95%, 125%, and 150% of the prescribed dose were 93.1% (range 92.2–98.5), 12% (range 7.4–32.2), and 0.24% (range 0–10.8), respectively. Median urethral volumes receiving 90% and 115% of the prescribed dose were 40.2% (range 21.0–83.8) and 0% (range 0–1), respectively. All patients achieved complete remission. No patient developed G3 or G4 acute or late toxicities. No patient experienced urethral stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Surface HDR-BT in penile cancer is feasible and is associated with a high tolerance profile and good outcomes.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1502901
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact