The authors would like to acknowledge missing data for all prior latanoprost users as a whole. The following sentence has been added to the manuscript (page 8, first paragraph): Mean (SD) reduction from baseline at Month 6 for users of all latanoprost formulations (preserved and PF) was 6.1 (4.25) mmHg (25.9%; p\0.0001). The authors have also prepared a table to summarise the change in intraocular pressure following a switch to the preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination from all latanoprost formulations (preserved and preservative-free formulations). See Table 1 below.(Table Preseneted.) .The original article has been corrected.
Correction to: Switching to Preservative-Free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Subanalysis of Data from the VISIONARY Study According to Baseline Monotherapy Treatment (Advances in Therapy, (2022), 39, 8, (3501-3521), 10.1007/s12325-022-02166-6)
Rossetti L.;Marchini G.;Cagini C.;
2022
Abstract
The authors would like to acknowledge missing data for all prior latanoprost users as a whole. The following sentence has been added to the manuscript (page 8, first paragraph): Mean (SD) reduction from baseline at Month 6 for users of all latanoprost formulations (preserved and PF) was 6.1 (4.25) mmHg (25.9%; p\0.0001). The authors have also prepared a table to summarise the change in intraocular pressure following a switch to the preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination from all latanoprost formulations (preserved and preservative-free formulations). See Table 1 below.(Table Preseneted.) .The original article has been corrected.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
