The essay examines the interplay between criminal asset measures and enforcement proceedings, with a particular focus on the overlap between civil enforcement procedures and seizures or confiscations ordered in criminal contexts. It analyzes the fragmented and inconsistent regulatory framework provided by the Anti-Mafia Code and explores the potential analogical application of certain provisions from the Business Crisis Code to balance the interests involved, emphasizing the protection of the rights of bona fide third-party creditors. The analysis aims to outline a systematic framework to address unresolved issues in the field.
l saggio analizza le interrelazioni tra misure patrimoniali penali e processo esecutivo, ponendo particolare attenzione alla concorrenza tra le procedure esecutive civili e i sequestri o confische disposte in ambito penale. Viene esaminata la regolamentazione frammentaria e disomogenea offerta dal Codice antimafia e si ipotizza l'applicazione analogica di alcune disposizioni del Codice della crisi d'impresa per bilanciare gli interessi coinvolti, con un focus sulla tutela dei diritti dei terzi creditori di buona fede. L'analisi mira a delineare un quadro sistematico utile per risolvere le criticità ancora aperte nella materia. The essay examines the interplay between criminal asset measures and enforcement proceedings, with a particular focus on the overlap between civil enforcement procedures and seizures or confiscations ordered in criminal contexts. It analyzes the fragmented and inconsistent regulatory framework provided by the Anti-Mafia Code and explores the potential analogical application of certain provisions from the Business Crisis Code to balance the interests involved, emphasizing the protection of the rights of bona fide third-party creditors. The analysis aims to outline a systematic framework to address unresolved issues in the field.
INTERRELAZIONI E CRITICITÀ TRA MISURE PATRIMONIALI PENALI E PROCESSO ESECUTIVO
Francesca Tizi
2023
Abstract
The essay examines the interplay between criminal asset measures and enforcement proceedings, with a particular focus on the overlap between civil enforcement procedures and seizures or confiscations ordered in criminal contexts. It analyzes the fragmented and inconsistent regulatory framework provided by the Anti-Mafia Code and explores the potential analogical application of certain provisions from the Business Crisis Code to balance the interests involved, emphasizing the protection of the rights of bona fide third-party creditors. The analysis aims to outline a systematic framework to address unresolved issues in the field.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.