We found an error in the differential cross sections plotted in Figs. 3, 4, and 5. The output of the analysis code (AZURE2) was already in the center-of-mass frame, but in the final drawing process, we made a laboratory frame to center-of-mass frame conversion again, so that an extra conversion factor is introduced into the calculation. As a result, the plotted cross sections are all 1.7–2.7 times larger than the real values. The plots with correct cross sections are as shown below. Note that this is only a plotting problem that does not affect other results discussed in the paper, including all the resonance parameters shown in Table I. We also found a minor error in the first paragraph of Sec. III: “... the peaks near Ec.m. = 3.3 and 5.4 MeV (Eex = 13.4, 15.4, and 18.0 MeV) are retained... .” In the parentheses it ought to be “Eex= 13.4 and 15.4 MeV.”
10C+ α elastic scattering: A study of the proton-rich 14O nucleus and α clustering
Palmerini, SMembro del Collaboration Group
;
2024
Abstract
We found an error in the differential cross sections plotted in Figs. 3, 4, and 5. The output of the analysis code (AZURE2) was already in the center-of-mass frame, but in the final drawing process, we made a laboratory frame to center-of-mass frame conversion again, so that an extra conversion factor is introduced into the calculation. As a result, the plotted cross sections are all 1.7–2.7 times larger than the real values. The plots with correct cross sections are as shown below. Note that this is only a plotting problem that does not affect other results discussed in the paper, including all the resonance parameters shown in Table I. We also found a minor error in the first paragraph of Sec. III: “... the peaks near Ec.m. = 3.3 and 5.4 MeV (Eex = 13.4, 15.4, and 18.0 MeV) are retained... .” In the parentheses it ought to be “Eex= 13.4 and 15.4 MeV.”I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
