Being able to assess the amount of uncertainty locally associated to dense point clouds generated by measurement can help investigate the relations between the metrological performance of a chosen measuring technology, and the local geometric and surface properties of the measurand geometry. In previous research it was demonstrated that spatial statistics based on Gaussian Random Fields and measurement repeats could be used to obtain spatial maps capturing both local dispersion and local bias associated to the position of points within measured clouds. However, the previous method had scalability limitations when handling very dense point clouds, due to it requiring the resolution of a global, increasingly larger, covariance matrix in order to solve the random field fitting problem. This work presents a variant to the previous method, where the covariance matrix is solved only locally, making the method better scalable to handle denser point clouds. Despite the new method not being able to return an equally rich information content in relation to spatial covariance, it still allows to obtain almost equally accurate information on local bias and variance, with significant gains in terms of processing speed and, importantly, making it now possible to handle very dense clouds which would be unviable to process with the original method.
Assessing the spatial distribution of positional error associated to dense point cloud measurements using regional Gaussian random fields
Senin, Nicola;
2024
Abstract
Being able to assess the amount of uncertainty locally associated to dense point clouds generated by measurement can help investigate the relations between the metrological performance of a chosen measuring technology, and the local geometric and surface properties of the measurand geometry. In previous research it was demonstrated that spatial statistics based on Gaussian Random Fields and measurement repeats could be used to obtain spatial maps capturing both local dispersion and local bias associated to the position of points within measured clouds. However, the previous method had scalability limitations when handling very dense point clouds, due to it requiring the resolution of a global, increasingly larger, covariance matrix in order to solve the random field fitting problem. This work presents a variant to the previous method, where the covariance matrix is solved only locally, making the method better scalable to handle denser point clouds. Despite the new method not being able to return an equally rich information content in relation to spatial covariance, it still allows to obtain almost equally accurate information on local bias and variance, with significant gains in terms of processing speed and, importantly, making it now possible to handle very dense clouds which would be unviable to process with the original method.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.