Despite its central role in pediatric pre-surgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, conventional analog 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT (aPET) systems often yield modest epileptogenic zone (EZ) detection rates (~50–60%). Silicon photomultiplier–based digital PET/CT (dPET) promises enhanced image quality, but its performance in pediatric epilepsy remains untested. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 22 children (mean age 11.5 ± 2.6 years) who underwent interictal brain 18F-FDG PET/CT: 11 on an analog system (Discovery ST, 2018–2019) and 11 on a digital system (Biograph Vision 450, 2020–2021). Three blinded nuclear medicine physicians independently scored EZ localization and image quality (4-point scale); post-surgical histology and ≥1-year clinical follow-up served as reference. Results: The EZ was correctly identified in 8/11 analog scans (72.7%) versus 10/11 digital scans (90.9%). Average image quality was significantly higher with dPET (3.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9; p < 0.05), and inter-reader agreement improved from good (ICC = 0.63) to excellent (ICC = 0.91). Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that dPET enhances image clarity and reader consistency, potentially improving localization accuracy in pediatric epilepsy presurgical workups
Clinical performance of analog and digital 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric epileptogenic zone localization: Preliminary results
Francesco Bianconi;Barbara Palumbo;
2025
Abstract
Despite its central role in pediatric pre-surgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, conventional analog 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT (aPET) systems often yield modest epileptogenic zone (EZ) detection rates (~50–60%). Silicon photomultiplier–based digital PET/CT (dPET) promises enhanced image quality, but its performance in pediatric epilepsy remains untested. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 22 children (mean age 11.5 ± 2.6 years) who underwent interictal brain 18F-FDG PET/CT: 11 on an analog system (Discovery ST, 2018–2019) and 11 on a digital system (Biograph Vision 450, 2020–2021). Three blinded nuclear medicine physicians independently scored EZ localization and image quality (4-point scale); post-surgical histology and ≥1-year clinical follow-up served as reference. Results: The EZ was correctly identified in 8/11 analog scans (72.7%) versus 10/11 digital scans (90.9%). Average image quality was significantly higher with dPET (3.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9; p < 0.05), and inter-reader agreement improved from good (ICC = 0.63) to excellent (ICC = 0.91). Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that dPET enhances image clarity and reader consistency, potentially improving localization accuracy in pediatric epilepsy presurgical workupsI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
