This article systematically reviews the causal literature on the impacts of women’s land rights on developmentin the Global South, asking how theyaffect different development outcomes, and what patterns emerge across types of rights, geographies, and methodological approaches. Following the PRISMA protocol, we screen over 800 records and retain 96 studies, covering 46 countries and 202 effects classified in 11 outcomes. Findings show consistently positive effectson empowerment, education, and health, though the latter are less studied. Evidence on investment, financial inclusion, and welfareis more ambiguous, while natural resource managementand intra-household dynamicsremain too underexplored for meaningful conclusions. Most research focuses on formal ownership, overlooking the broader ‘bundle’of rights; regions outside Africa and South Asia are critically underrepresented. By mapping causal patterns and gaps, this review establishes a systematic evidence map and guides future evaluations addressing thematic and geographic blind spots.

Land, Women and Development: A Systematic Review of Causal Evidence

Sara Balestri
;
2025

Abstract

This article systematically reviews the causal literature on the impacts of women’s land rights on developmentin the Global South, asking how theyaffect different development outcomes, and what patterns emerge across types of rights, geographies, and methodological approaches. Following the PRISMA protocol, we screen over 800 records and retain 96 studies, covering 46 countries and 202 effects classified in 11 outcomes. Findings show consistently positive effectson empowerment, education, and health, though the latter are less studied. Evidence on investment, financial inclusion, and welfareis more ambiguous, while natural resource managementand intra-household dynamicsremain too underexplored for meaningful conclusions. Most research focuses on formal ownership, overlooking the broader ‘bundle’of rights; regions outside Africa and South Asia are critically underrepresented. By mapping causal patterns and gaps, this review establishes a systematic evidence map and guides future evaluations addressing thematic and geographic blind spots.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1606315
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact