The effect of orally administered L-carnitine on the quality of semen obtained from stallions with different semen qualities was investigated. Four stallions with proven fertility (high motility group, HM) and with normal seminal characteristics (>50% progressive motility and >80 106 spermatozoa/ ml), and four questionable breeders (low motility group, LM) with <50% of sperm progressive motility and <80 106 spermatozoa/ml, received p.o. 20 g of L-carnitine for 60 days. Blood and semen samples were collected before treatment (T0) and after 30 (T1) and 60 days (T2). Semen evaluation were performed on five consecutive daily ejaculates (n ¼ 120 ejaculates) and conventional semen analysis was carried out on each ejaculate, both at collection and after refrigeration for 24, 48, and 72 h. Furthermore L-carnitine, acetylcarnitine, pyruvate, and lactate concentrations, and carnitine acetyltransferase activity (CAT) were determined both in raw semen and seminal plasma. There were an increase in progressive motile spermatozoa only in the LM group (26:8 12:9, 39:1 15:5, and 48:8 8:6 for T0, T1, and T2, respectively). Free seminal plasma carnitine concentration was higher in the LM group compared to the HM one. Both pyruvate and lactate were higher in the LM group. Raw semen and seminal plasma carnitine and acetylcarnitine levels correlate positively with both sperm concentration and progressive motility; moreover, acetylcarnitine content was positively correlated with total motile morphologically normal spermatozoa. In conclusion, oral administration of L-carnitine to stallions with questionable seminal characteristicsmay improve spermatozoa kinetics and morphological characteristics; whereas, it seem to be ineffective in normospermic animals.

Effect of L-carnitine administration on the seminal characteristics of oligoasthenospermic stallions.

SYLLA, Lakamy;ZELLI, Riccardo;MONACI, Maurizio
2004

Abstract

The effect of orally administered L-carnitine on the quality of semen obtained from stallions with different semen qualities was investigated. Four stallions with proven fertility (high motility group, HM) and with normal seminal characteristics (>50% progressive motility and >80 106 spermatozoa/ ml), and four questionable breeders (low motility group, LM) with <50% of sperm progressive motility and <80 106 spermatozoa/ml, received p.o. 20 g of L-carnitine for 60 days. Blood and semen samples were collected before treatment (T0) and after 30 (T1) and 60 days (T2). Semen evaluation were performed on five consecutive daily ejaculates (n ¼ 120 ejaculates) and conventional semen analysis was carried out on each ejaculate, both at collection and after refrigeration for 24, 48, and 72 h. Furthermore L-carnitine, acetylcarnitine, pyruvate, and lactate concentrations, and carnitine acetyltransferase activity (CAT) were determined both in raw semen and seminal plasma. There were an increase in progressive motile spermatozoa only in the LM group (26:8 12:9, 39:1 15:5, and 48:8 8:6 for T0, T1, and T2, respectively). Free seminal plasma carnitine concentration was higher in the LM group compared to the HM one. Both pyruvate and lactate were higher in the LM group. Raw semen and seminal plasma carnitine and acetylcarnitine levels correlate positively with both sperm concentration and progressive motility; moreover, acetylcarnitine content was positively correlated with total motile morphologically normal spermatozoa. In conclusion, oral administration of L-carnitine to stallions with questionable seminal characteristicsmay improve spermatozoa kinetics and morphological characteristics; whereas, it seem to be ineffective in normospermic animals.
2004
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/162158
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 47
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact