We report a study designed to investigate the eVectiveness of task-irrelevant unimodal and bimodal audiotactile stimuli in capturing a person’s spatial attention away from a highly perceptually demanding central rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. In “Experiment 1”, participants made speeded elevation discrimination responses to peripheral visual targets following the presentation of auditory stimuli that were either presented alone or else were paired with centrally presented tactile stimuli. The results showed that the unimodal auditory stimuli only captured spatial attention when participants were not performing the RSVP task, while the bimodal audiotactile stimuli did not result in any performance change in any of the conditions. In “Experiment 2”, spatial auditory stimuli were either presented alone or else were paired with a tactile stimulus presented from the same direction. In contrast to the results of “Experiment 1”, the bimodal audiotactile stimuli were especially eVective in capturing participants’ spatial attention from the concurrent RSVP task. These results therefore provide support for the claim that auditory and tactile stimuli should be presented from the same direction if they are to capture attention eVectively. Implications for multisensory warning signal design are discussed.

Multisensory warning signals: When spatial correspondence matters

SANTANGELO, Valerio;
2009

Abstract

We report a study designed to investigate the eVectiveness of task-irrelevant unimodal and bimodal audiotactile stimuli in capturing a person’s spatial attention away from a highly perceptually demanding central rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. In “Experiment 1”, participants made speeded elevation discrimination responses to peripheral visual targets following the presentation of auditory stimuli that were either presented alone or else were paired with centrally presented tactile stimuli. The results showed that the unimodal auditory stimuli only captured spatial attention when participants were not performing the RSVP task, while the bimodal audiotactile stimuli did not result in any performance change in any of the conditions. In “Experiment 2”, spatial auditory stimuli were either presented alone or else were paired with a tactile stimulus presented from the same direction. In contrast to the results of “Experiment 1”, the bimodal audiotactile stimuli were especially eVective in capturing participants’ spatial attention from the concurrent RSVP task. These results therefore provide support for the claim that auditory and tactile stimuli should be presented from the same direction if they are to capture attention eVectively. Implications for multisensory warning signal design are discussed.
2009
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/165797
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 61
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
social impact