In the last two decades considerable work has been devoted to Italian Fascism considered as a form of political religion. Yet the debate about the religious nature of Italian fascism after the fall of the regime is almost completely neglected. After July 1943 anti-Fascist public discourse aimed at promoting the so-called ‘antifascist paradigm’. This reassuring narrative, which depicted fascism as a regime that had failed its goal to fascistize the Italian people, was supposed to allow the country to start a new democratic life, but produced a substantial misunderstanding of the actual nature of Mussolini’s regime. Opposing this trend, some Catholic and ex-fascist intellectuals affirmed a counter-narrative of the recent past. They described fascism as a contemporary, religious-based totalitarian regime, and attributed to these features its appeal to Italian society. The opinions expressed by these intellectuals openly recalled those of Italian anti-fascists as well as Christian and lay intellectuals all over Europe who, starting from the mid-1930s, had acknowledged the religious nature of contemporary totalitarianism. From this point of view, they became part of a wider school of thought which sought to understand the phenomenon of the sacralization of politics. Intentionally disregarded and misunderstood by their contemporaries, these intellectuals nonetheless left a valuable patrimony of knowledge which, subsequently brought to light, has represented the basis for the elaboration of more advanced interpretations of the twentiethcentury totalitarian experience.
Interpretations of Fascism as a Political Religion in Post-Fascist Italy (1943-1948)
LA ROVERE, LUCA
2014
Abstract
In the last two decades considerable work has been devoted to Italian Fascism considered as a form of political religion. Yet the debate about the religious nature of Italian fascism after the fall of the regime is almost completely neglected. After July 1943 anti-Fascist public discourse aimed at promoting the so-called ‘antifascist paradigm’. This reassuring narrative, which depicted fascism as a regime that had failed its goal to fascistize the Italian people, was supposed to allow the country to start a new democratic life, but produced a substantial misunderstanding of the actual nature of Mussolini’s regime. Opposing this trend, some Catholic and ex-fascist intellectuals affirmed a counter-narrative of the recent past. They described fascism as a contemporary, religious-based totalitarian regime, and attributed to these features its appeal to Italian society. The opinions expressed by these intellectuals openly recalled those of Italian anti-fascists as well as Christian and lay intellectuals all over Europe who, starting from the mid-1930s, had acknowledged the religious nature of contemporary totalitarianism. From this point of view, they became part of a wider school of thought which sought to understand the phenomenon of the sacralization of politics. Intentionally disregarded and misunderstood by their contemporaries, these intellectuals nonetheless left a valuable patrimony of knowledge which, subsequently brought to light, has represented the basis for the elaboration of more advanced interpretations of the twentiethcentury totalitarian experience.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.