Objective: To report conservative and surgical strategies for treatment of mesh erosion after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Methods: Between 1998 and 2008, 179 patients underwent integral pelvic floor reconstruction for advanced POP in our tertiary urogynecological unit. Patients’ charts and follow-up data were entered into a computerized database and data analysis performed to search for mesh erosion/complications/surgery. Results: 12 patients were diagnosed and treated for mesh erosion: in 10 of 179, surgery was performed in our department and the mesh used was polypropylene (PP): 3 after colposacropexy (CSP) (5.5%), 5 after CSP + hysterectomy (Hys) (6.5%), and 2 after hysterosacropexy (HSP) (3.9%); in 1 case, Gore-tex mesh was used, and another case had undergone CSP in another hospital using PP mesh. Time to mesh erosion ranged from 2 to 66 months (mean 22.9), with 4 erosions (33%) within 6 months of POP repair. In 4 asymptomatic patients (33%) erosion was incidentally discovered during clinical check-ups at 4, 31, 36 and 66 months. Five cases (41%) presented with occasional vaginal bleeding, associated with dyspareunia in 2. Treatments were individualized but in all cases conservative treatment was unable to resolve the complications and surgery was needed. At a mean follow-up of 57 months (range 18–120) after surgical treatment all patients were asymptomatic and free from erosions. Conclusions: The surgeon who approaches management of complications after abdominal/laparoscopic sacropexy should possess a comprehensive understanding of pelvic floor anatomy and surgical skills in order to individualize the management of such complications.

Managing Mesh Erosion after Abdominal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair: Ten Years Experience in a Single Center

COSTANTINI, Elisabetta;ZUCCHI, ALESSANDRO;LAZZERI, MASSIMO;DEL ZINGARO, Michele;VIANELLO, ALBERTO;PORENA, Massimo
2011

Abstract

Objective: To report conservative and surgical strategies for treatment of mesh erosion after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Methods: Between 1998 and 2008, 179 patients underwent integral pelvic floor reconstruction for advanced POP in our tertiary urogynecological unit. Patients’ charts and follow-up data were entered into a computerized database and data analysis performed to search for mesh erosion/complications/surgery. Results: 12 patients were diagnosed and treated for mesh erosion: in 10 of 179, surgery was performed in our department and the mesh used was polypropylene (PP): 3 after colposacropexy (CSP) (5.5%), 5 after CSP + hysterectomy (Hys) (6.5%), and 2 after hysterosacropexy (HSP) (3.9%); in 1 case, Gore-tex mesh was used, and another case had undergone CSP in another hospital using PP mesh. Time to mesh erosion ranged from 2 to 66 months (mean 22.9), with 4 erosions (33%) within 6 months of POP repair. In 4 asymptomatic patients (33%) erosion was incidentally discovered during clinical check-ups at 4, 31, 36 and 66 months. Five cases (41%) presented with occasional vaginal bleeding, associated with dyspareunia in 2. Treatments were individualized but in all cases conservative treatment was unable to resolve the complications and surgery was needed. At a mean follow-up of 57 months (range 18–120) after surgical treatment all patients were asymptomatic and free from erosions. Conclusions: The surgeon who approaches management of complications after abdominal/laparoscopic sacropexy should possess a comprehensive understanding of pelvic floor anatomy and surgical skills in order to individualize the management of such complications.
2011
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/237089
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact