In her essay Méta-tension, interpretation and speculativity, Furia Valori thematizes the méta-tension as the basis of thinking. Thinking implicates taking distance, elevating and landing on an upper level, a “méta-level”, considered as the truest to judge from. But that “méta-level”, because it is inasmuch determined as limited, implicates the reference to an upper and wider justification level, to an unconditional condition, which on one side doesn’t depend on the thinker’s discretion, and on the other side delivers itself , with its proper modality, in the sense’s articulation, in the talk about the truthful/interpreting “méta-level”. Therefore the unconditional condition have to think dialectically as an “in-over” (“in-oltre”), which permits both thinking and being: hermeneutical declension of the ontological argument and of the libera necessitas.
Tensione-méta, interpretazione e speculatività
VALORI, Furia
2010
Abstract
In her essay Méta-tension, interpretation and speculativity, Furia Valori thematizes the méta-tension as the basis of thinking. Thinking implicates taking distance, elevating and landing on an upper level, a “méta-level”, considered as the truest to judge from. But that “méta-level”, because it is inasmuch determined as limited, implicates the reference to an upper and wider justification level, to an unconditional condition, which on one side doesn’t depend on the thinker’s discretion, and on the other side delivers itself , with its proper modality, in the sense’s articulation, in the talk about the truthful/interpreting “méta-level”. Therefore the unconditional condition have to think dialectically as an “in-over” (“in-oltre”), which permits both thinking and being: hermeneutical declension of the ontological argument and of the libera necessitas.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
