: Objectives: Despite continuous advances in diagnosis, such as the "Two week wait" policy for hospital specialist referral and fast-track diagnostic pathways, lung cancers are detected mostly at advanced stages. Our aim was to evaluate the fast-track diagnostic pathway in a tertiary hospital. Methods: Between March and September 2022, 114 consecutive patients with respiratory symptoms or radiology suspicions of lung cancer were referred to our "Pulmonary Point" outpatient clinic. The time intervals to take in the charges and conduct biopsy and 18FDGPET-CT were prospectively collected. Furthermore, the patients' experiences were evaluated by means of a six-item questionnaire investigating the outpatient clinic environment and accessibility, the kindness and professional approach of the healthcare professionals, the psychological support provided and an overall evaluation. The data were compared with those of 79 patients observed in the Thoracic Surgery Ambulatory in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period of March-September 2019 before the fast-track diagnostic pathway for lung cancer was established. Results: The patients were referred to the "Pulmonary Point" outpatient clinic by a General Practitioner in 44 cases (38.5%), by other Specialists in 56 (49.1%) and by an Emergency Department in 14 (12.2%). Among the 114 patients, 104 (91.2%) were visited within 3 working days. Biopsies (FNAB, EBUS, bronchoscopy or surgical) were performed at a median period of 18 days (IQR: 9-26), and 18FDGPET-CT was carried out at a median period of 16 days (IQR: 7-25). The patients referred to the Thoracic Surgery Ambulatory in the period of March-September 2019 were characterized by longer times to biopsy [26 days (IQR: 12-54), p < 0.001] and to 18FDGPET-CT [25 days (IQR: 15-38), p = 0.003]. The patients referred in 2022 reported higher scores in the clinic environment (p < 0.001), psychological support provided (p < 0.001) and overall evaluation (p = 0.02) domains of the questionnaire. Conclusions: The establishment of a dedicated diagnostic pathway improves time to diagnosis and patients' satisfaction.

Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathway for Lung Cancer Detection: Single-Center Experience

Cirocchi, Roberto;Ragusa, Mark
2025

Abstract

: Objectives: Despite continuous advances in diagnosis, such as the "Two week wait" policy for hospital specialist referral and fast-track diagnostic pathways, lung cancers are detected mostly at advanced stages. Our aim was to evaluate the fast-track diagnostic pathway in a tertiary hospital. Methods: Between March and September 2022, 114 consecutive patients with respiratory symptoms or radiology suspicions of lung cancer were referred to our "Pulmonary Point" outpatient clinic. The time intervals to take in the charges and conduct biopsy and 18FDGPET-CT were prospectively collected. Furthermore, the patients' experiences were evaluated by means of a six-item questionnaire investigating the outpatient clinic environment and accessibility, the kindness and professional approach of the healthcare professionals, the psychological support provided and an overall evaluation. The data were compared with those of 79 patients observed in the Thoracic Surgery Ambulatory in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period of March-September 2019 before the fast-track diagnostic pathway for lung cancer was established. Results: The patients were referred to the "Pulmonary Point" outpatient clinic by a General Practitioner in 44 cases (38.5%), by other Specialists in 56 (49.1%) and by an Emergency Department in 14 (12.2%). Among the 114 patients, 104 (91.2%) were visited within 3 working days. Biopsies (FNAB, EBUS, bronchoscopy or surgical) were performed at a median period of 18 days (IQR: 9-26), and 18FDGPET-CT was carried out at a median period of 16 days (IQR: 7-25). The patients referred to the Thoracic Surgery Ambulatory in the period of March-September 2019 were characterized by longer times to biopsy [26 days (IQR: 12-54), p < 0.001] and to 18FDGPET-CT [25 days (IQR: 15-38), p = 0.003]. The patients referred in 2022 reported higher scores in the clinic environment (p < 0.001), psychological support provided (p < 0.001) and overall evaluation (p = 0.02) domains of the questionnaire. Conclusions: The establishment of a dedicated diagnostic pathway improves time to diagnosis and patients' satisfaction.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1599134
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact