In this work, the crossflow microfiltration (CFMF) performance of different lots of lager beer, produced in a pilot scale at the Italian Brewing Research Centre (CERB, Perugia, Italy), was assessed in a bench-top plant, equipped with a 0.8-μm ceramic tubular membrane module, under constant crossflow velocity of 6 m s−1, transmembrane pressure difference of 3.74 bar, temperature of ~10 °C, and periodic CO2 backflushing. By feeding different beer samples (i.e., as such, precentrifuged (C), or pretreated with a commercial enzyme preparation to degrade the original arabinoxylans and β- glucans and then centrifuged (EC) to minimize the fouling contribution of yeast cells, aggregates, and polysaccharides), it was possible to increase the average permeation flux (expressed as mean value±standard deviation) from 112±13 to 199±17 or 330±22 L m−2 h−1, respectively. Only when using the EC-pretreated beer specimens, the permeate turbidity at 20 °C approached the limiting one (<0.6 EBC unit) recommended by the European Brewery Convention standards. As expected, the permeate chill haze at 0 °C was generally higher than the above haze target. By submitting EC-pretreated beer seeded with 0.5 g L−1 of regenerable polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) to CFMF, it was possible to reduce the initial total polyphenol content by 30 % and permeate chill haze to 0.60±0.01 EBC unit, but the average permeation flux fell to 84±4 L m−2 h−1. By performing sequentially EC pretreatments, PVPP stabilization, cartridge filtration, and CFMF, it was possible not only to re-enhance the average permeation flux at about 230 L m−2 h−1 near to those achievable with DE filters, but also to obtain a chill haze-free permeate ready for aseptic packaging.

Novel Procedure for Lager Beer Clarification and Stabilization Using Sequential Enzymatic, Centrifugal, Regenerable PVPP and Crossflow Microfiltration Processing

MARCONI, Ombretta;PERRETTI, Giuseppe Italo Francesco;
2014

Abstract

In this work, the crossflow microfiltration (CFMF) performance of different lots of lager beer, produced in a pilot scale at the Italian Brewing Research Centre (CERB, Perugia, Italy), was assessed in a bench-top plant, equipped with a 0.8-μm ceramic tubular membrane module, under constant crossflow velocity of 6 m s−1, transmembrane pressure difference of 3.74 bar, temperature of ~10 °C, and periodic CO2 backflushing. By feeding different beer samples (i.e., as such, precentrifuged (C), or pretreated with a commercial enzyme preparation to degrade the original arabinoxylans and β- glucans and then centrifuged (EC) to minimize the fouling contribution of yeast cells, aggregates, and polysaccharides), it was possible to increase the average permeation flux (expressed as mean value±standard deviation) from 112±13 to 199±17 or 330±22 L m−2 h−1, respectively. Only when using the EC-pretreated beer specimens, the permeate turbidity at 20 °C approached the limiting one (<0.6 EBC unit) recommended by the European Brewery Convention standards. As expected, the permeate chill haze at 0 °C was generally higher than the above haze target. By submitting EC-pretreated beer seeded with 0.5 g L−1 of regenerable polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) to CFMF, it was possible to reduce the initial total polyphenol content by 30 % and permeate chill haze to 0.60±0.01 EBC unit, but the average permeation flux fell to 84±4 L m−2 h−1. By performing sequentially EC pretreatments, PVPP stabilization, cartridge filtration, and CFMF, it was possible not only to re-enhance the average permeation flux at about 230 L m−2 h−1 near to those achievable with DE filters, but also to obtain a chill haze-free permeate ready for aseptic packaging.
2014
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11391/1287945
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact